
Enterprise pilot
Evaluate how a reviewed image and its evidence enter your rollout, monitoring, rollback, ITSM, and audit workflows. Fleet operations are scoped integration work, not a one-click product claim.
Current product boundary: OpenFactory can create eligible artifacts and record selected build and test evidence. A production fleet needs a separate, customer-approved control plane for rollout, credentials, inventory, monitoring, updates, recovery, and retirement.
A recipe and checksum help identify what should be deployed. They do not tell a remote machine when to update, protect credentials, guarantee network reachability, detect every failure, or restore application data. Keep the artifact lifecycle and machine lifecycle linked, while assigning controls and owners to each boundary.
| Boundary | Evidence to retain | Decision owner |
|---|---|---|
| Recipe and build | Inputs, source references, log, resolved inventory, artifact checksum | Image maintainer and release reviewer |
| Acceptance tests | Named checks, environment, result, logs, exceptions, timestamp | Workload owner and test approver |
| Rollout | Target inventory, canary outcome, health gates, approvals, deployment record | Customer platform or operations team |
| Runtime and recovery | Observed version, alerts, incident links, backup and recovery test, retained prior artifact | Customer operations, security, and service owner |
OpenFactory includes configurable ServiceNow modules for change, inventory, incidents, events, and GRC-oriented evidence handoff. The integration and individual hooks are disabled by default and require an administrator to configure credentials, test access, select modules, and define the intended record mappings. ServiceNow records do not by themselves establish that a change was technically safe or compliant.
For regulated work, map each product record to a customer-owned requirement, procedure, reviewer, retention rule, and approval state. Keep “build completed,” “test passed,” “deployment accepted,” and “compliance approved” as separate events.
Build and review one representative artifact in the Linux image workflow, then bring its checksum, evidence, target environment, and recovery requirements to a scoped fleet-readiness pilot. The pilot should end with measured results, open risks, ownership, and a go/no-go decision rather than a generic promise to manage every fleet.
No. The self-service product builds and tests eligible Linux artifacts. Customer-controlled rollout, inventory, monitoring, update, rollback, and retirement are separate operating concerns. OpenFactory evaluates those integrations as scoped pilot work with written acceptance criteria.
A completed artifact can carry its recipe, source references, build log, checksum, resolved package and service inventory, and results for the tests that actually ran. Those records do not prove deployment success or regulatory compliance; they establish reviewable inputs for the next control boundary.
At minimum, test artifact verification, a canary rollout, health gates, identity and secret provisioning, inventory updates, failure detection, rollback or recovery, log retention, ownership, and destructive-action safeguards on the customer's actual target environment.
No. Product evidence may support an organization's control and validation process, but compliance depends on the full technical and organizational system, applicable requirements, documented procedures, retained evidence, risk decisions, and authorized approval.
Review the current recipe, build, artifact, and test boundary.
See the roadmap architecture and its explicit trust limits.
Review optional modules, disabled-by-default hooks, and ownership.
Map product evidence into a customer-owned validation process.
Use OpenFactory to turn the same requirements into a bootable, testable Linux system.